Advertisement
Articles

Why I Don't Use Libraries for Reference Anymore 

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |
Nov 15, 2010

ljx101102webRef3(Original Import)I began using public libraries decades ago, when the “People’s University” ethos was stronger and truer. I’ve reluctantly let go of that notion. Experience has taught me not to pursue interests at libraries that extend beyond light entertainment. You see, even though there are 26 libraries within a ten-mile radius of my home (13 public, two branches, 11 academic), I often have difficulty obtaining from them basic reference information and sometimes even materials.

The Reference User Experience
Fish Market 101: Why Not a Reference User Experience?, by Steven Bell
Imagination, Sympathy, and the User Experience, by Wayne Bivens-Tatum
Why I Don't Use Libraries for Reference Anymore, by Jean Costello
The Visibility and Invisibility of Librarians, by James LaRue

My most recent reference inquiry, for a pointer to a source for literary criticism, was a failure. I’d planned to reprint a famous poem, “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” by Dylan Thomas, on my blog and wanted to include a citation to an article that discussed its meaning. The source didn’t need to be the most authoritative or profound; I was simply looking for something about the poem beyond a superficial description of its structure. I never even got close.

An in-person inquiry at one of my area’s better public libraries wasn’t fruitful. The library director pointed me to the library’s database web page and signaled pretty clearly that this was the extent of the assistance I’d receive. The available databases proved poor references. Author and title searches of Gale’s Contemporary Literary Criticism returned 141 articles with tangential mentions; the results were totally irrelevant. Advanced search was a misnomer. Gale’s Biography in Context was also listed as a literary source though it proved to be merely a rudimentary resource for grade-schoolers.

Even though I knew it was a no-no, I tried the online chat with a library 30 miles away. The staff were helpful and referred a database that my region doesn’t subscribe to, which was okay. Though I wasn’t any closer to finding a source, I felt good about the library experience until an email from the library director arrived shortly thereafter. She kindly explained that the online reference service was for her town’s taxpayers and requested that I not use it again.

Access denied

At this point I could have personally visited one of the academic libraries but was concerned that I might come up short there as well. Literature wasn’t listed on the database page of the two largest colleges, which may have been a signal that the topic isn’t “in their wheelhouse.” Besides, I just didn’t have the stamina to face the interrogation that precedes each inquiry (are you a student here, a faculty member, a town resident), even when there are no other patrons on the floor. I can never be sure if the staff are censuring me or are fearful of being chastised by a supervisor for providing out-of-boundary service, but, either way, the routine usually feels lousy.

So I gave up—the information just wasn’t worth the hassle.

My track record for obtaining materials through public libraries has also been hit or miss. Interlibrary loan (ILL) requests have been denied a few times because a book was in an academic collection. Despite reciprocal lending agreements, cooperation between institutions seems strained, and so I’ve needed to escalate with one of the libraries to free up the material. Recently, I had difficulty requesting a journal article a public library reference librarian helped me identify because the staffer who processes ILL was unfamiliar with scholarly citations and became exasperated when I suggested she might need the volume and page numbers to obtain the article for me.

Some of what I’ve described here is because I’m a resident of Massachusetts, whose library system might well be the most fragmented and parochial in the nation. Some of it, though, is symptomatic of intractable resource management issues that create barriers between people seeking information and those who can provide it.

The libraries near me would probably cite funding as a cause for poor service, but I’m not persuaded. Budget increases would do nothing to discourage consortia from licensing inadequate database products. They would do nothing about library culture that fragments processes to the point that a reference librarian who identifies a source cannot do the transaction to procure it, and the person responsible for ILL isn’t sufficiently trained to bring in the material. Larger budgets would also not address the provincialism that discourages or prohibits library staff from servicing “outsiders” even when there are no “insiders” in the support queue. My struggle to get what seem like basic services from an epicenter of 26 libraries is not a resource problem; it’s a resource management problem.

I’ve learned not to push

I’ve been told I’m the model reference user—the kind of curious and savvy patron whom librarians wish would walk through the door. Yet, when I actually do come through, I bring inquiries that bump up against barriers and generate friction. Sometimes my requests are outside a staff member’s comfort zone. Sometimes they may tweak a professional frustration about limited cultural or institutional resources and that gets reflected back to me. So I’ve learned not to push. Instead, I’ve come to accept that the libraries available to me are good sources for popular entertainment material and pleasant conversation with staff. Anything else is more than the system can provide.


Author Information
Jean Costello (radicalpatron.com/contact) is a Technical Project Manager for a prominent STM publisher and blogs regularly as the Radical Patron (radicalpatron.com)



Reader Comments (75)


Jean, So sorry for your experience. I don't know the particular circumstances of your reference interviews - they are briefly described. I don't know the situation at the time of your visit, but I know from my own experience that our public libraries are swamped with patrons and drowning at the circulation desk. Plus, as you know, library budgets are under tremendous stress. How much staff was available at the branch you visited. You describe it as one of the 'better' libraries, but don't indicate what that means? Better service? Materials more suited to your tastes and interests? Fortunate to have been equipped with newer, more aesthetically pleasing furniture? When I look at the burden our public libraries face, I feel fortunate to be in an academic library at our area's technical college. Sometimes, when we're not too busy, which is common from about 9:00am-2:30pm, we can spend an extended amount of time with patrons (students), say twenty or thirty minutes. Often we do so via an appointment system. Baring that, we take reference emails, text messages, chats (from anyone who manages to find our webpage) and even Skype appointments. I shudder to imagine the work atmosphere at the library you describe if the director acted as you indicated. I hope you share your article with that director - hopefully it will be topic in staff meetings or for the local library board. And please don't judge all libraries by a few negative experiences. I know so many talented, dedicated librarians who would go the extra mile/kilometer for patrons, and I try to find ways to learn from them and emulate their talents every day.

Posted by Matthew C. / Madison, WI on November 16, 2010 05:09:10PM

Sounds like you had a really bad reference user experience (yes, they can really good or really bad). Maybe you'd like to point these folks over to my essay on the reference UX. It might help.

Posted by StevenB on November 16, 2010 06:51:48PM

Hi Matthew - thanks for your kind feedback. I had the great fortune to attend the Reference Renaissance Conference in August and met many progressive, dedicated librarians and library professors. I also correspond by email and phone with readers of my blog, and get first-hand exposure to some awesome library talent that way. These interactions and my knowledge of collaborative efforts across the country that help mitigate the chutes and ladders I face here in Massachusetts help remind me some of my experience is strictly local. I tried to acknowledge that in the article. What I also tried to do was name common facets of library culture and organization that create barriers between libraries and users, with the hope of generating constructive dialogue, like ours. Here's a bit more about my circumstances. Our libraries in Massachusetts are numerous, though mostly small and disconnected from one another. The ones I visit in central Mass have never been swamped with people when I visit; indeed, I'm often one of a few people there. We're also not technologically sophisticated, so staff aren't busy answering questions via digital channels. My sense is that staff are more comfortable with the social aspects of working at the library - exchanging local news with patrons, asking after loved ones - and tasks that do not involve adult interaction: working with children, moving materials, scheduling meeting rooms or telephoning patrons to let them know there is a book on the hold shelf. My inquires are outside the norm for them. I indicated one library was better because the staff is more approachable; staff at some of the neighboring libraries are totally heads down. Public libraries (in my area and I gather across the nation) seem to be in closed feedback loop. A lot of people with needs like mine don't use them and therefore libraries aren't accustomed to servicing us. Because we find the services inadequate, we don't use libraries. It's a real dilemma. One of the reasons I share my experiences and try to offer new ideas and perspectives (via my blog) is because I believe deeply in the value of libraries and figure that if I do what my friends and colleagues do --- and simply stop using and thinking about libraries, it will only contribute to their decline. Instead, I encourage a more systematic approach to our libraries nationally so we can use the considerable resources we invest in them to deliver more and better services that appeal to a broader constituency. It's what everyone wants - we just need to figure out how to do it. I've shared specific ideas on new forms of library value (http://www.radicalpatron.com/category/participatory-librarianship/) as well as what national cooperation within the library ecosystem and with the public might look like (http://www.radicalpatron.com/category/npl/). There's so much potential and so much at stake here ... for libraries and the American people. Jean

Posted by Jean Costello on November 16, 2010 07:42:42PM

As a librarian, I admit to seeing myself in some of your descriptions. It's painful but necessary to have flaws pointed out, so thanks for the reminder that staff needs to be welcoming and as helpful as possible. As a librarian in central Massachusetts, I do like belonging to a regional network, which can provide resources beyond what any library could do for itself, especially the small ones. The delivery system is great and the online databases are generally excellent. However, it sounds like some libraries may not be using those resources in the best way. Labeling "Biography in Context" as a literary source is just not correct, and offering it to an adult patron who wants some detailed criticism is wrong. Also, it was nice of the director to show you how to use the literary databases, but you wouldn't be able to put a link on your blog because anyone clicking on it would have to sign in with a library card from that town. What he should have done instead was an Internet search (and just doing a cursory Google search, I found a few things that may have helped you). I wonder if some of your experience has to do with those small libraries needing to cross-train staff. I am a librarian with an MLS, but I have to work the circulation desk a few hours a week. When I get a reference question while I'm working circ, I feel like I can't give that patron the time he/she deserves because I have other patrons who then queue up simply to check out their materials. It's an issue I have yet to solve, as reference is my priority but I also have the secondary task of checking out patrons' items. (I also have the problem of other staff not passing on reference questions and so patrons sometimes don't get the service they need from me because they never hear about me.) However, I like reference transactions and often when I get one it's a moment of excitement that I get a chance to use my knowledge and skill and help someone find an answer to a question. You are correct that small libraries are often not very busy and are seen as more of a social institution than an educational one. What we do to change that is an issue we struggle with.

Posted by Marcie on November 17, 2010 08:45:44AM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information


 

Welcome the LJ Archives.

This archive site is the home to all LJ articles published prior to January 2012;
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.