Advertisement
Articles

A Safe Haven on Campus? | From the Bell Tower 

We think of the academic library as a safe, secure haven, but crime happens everywhere on campus

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |
Steven Bell, Associate University Librarian, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA Feb 3, 2011

ljx101102refbell(SideBox)

In a recent column I mentioned my visits to other academic libraries. One of the first things I tend to notice when I walk into another academic library is whether or not there is a security guard at the entrance. If you never worked in an academic library with a guard stationed at the door, you probably don't think about this much, but when I see one it tells me something about the campus and its community. For one thing, there's probably a higher incidence of theft, of both materials and personal belongings.

A door guard can help by performing identification checks to keep track of who is entering and leaving the building, as well as checking bags, if needed, as people exit. When academic libraries are located in communities where crime is a concern, door guards can also be a sign to let potential criminals know the library is vigilant. Guards are also helpful for communicating with campus security when a crime or altercation happens in the library, which is a good thing, because academic librarians are typically ill prepared for these situations.

It starts with awareness
If your academic library rarely experiences crime of any type, I'm glad to hear it. But I suspect that fewer fall into this category. Whether it's petty theft from backpacks, the loss of electronic devices when students get careless, or something of a more violent or threatening nature, more of our libraries are coping with crime.

In my current position I've gained a heightened awareness of the crime issue because I'm responsible for monitoring our campus crime reports for any library-related items, and I serve as the liaison to campus security. Our library does use door guards, we do check IDs, and we do ask outside guests to sign a logbook. As a result we have a good track record for minimal crime, and have gained efficiency at working with campus police to ban those whose behavior violates our code of conduct. These individuals know that returning to the library will result in their arrest.

Getting betting better at crime prevention involves awareness, policies, and preparation, and that means acknowledging that our libraries are no safe havens.

The tower's dark side
That the ivory tower was ever a safe haven in the past 50 years is now acknowledged as myth. The authors of The Dark Side of the Ivory Tower: Campus Crime as a Social Problem point to the 1960s and the decline of the tradition of in loco parentis as a time when greater freedoms led to more opportunity for campus crime. In tandem with the growth of students taking greater risks and demonstrating increased irresponsible behavior came the campus administration's lax attitude toward campus security.

In an interview the authors share how the lawsuits, federal regulations on crime reporting, sensitivity to bad publicity, and increased competition for students improved the way institutions approached campus security. Because of the long hours of library operation, many late into the night when the crowd thins, and dimly lit or rarely visited nooks and crannies, administrations should be concerned about the library as a prime location for criminal activity. As Dark Side of the Ivory Tower points out, greater awareness leads to more security cameras in academic libraries, routine patrols by undercover campus police, and other techniques we must introduce as preventative measures.

Staying vigilant
Keeping our libraries safe is the responsibility of every staff member. Here's an example. In the fall semester I received a phone call from a librarian working the reference desk. She calmly related how a male student had just walked up to her and said that everyone in the library needed to be extra careful today and that he would be back later to check on things. That's not the sort of thing you expect a student to say, and you'd be right to think it bizarre. My colleague said it was probably nothing, but she felt that she should share it with me. I thought she was probably right, but these days we can take nothing for granted and we can no longer afford to assume everything is all right. That's why I called campus security to report the incident.

When the officers arrived they interviewed our librarian who gave a description. The student was located shortly thereafter in the Student Center. It turns out this student does have a learning disability which results in him occasionally saying rather strange things—some alarming. We were told that in the future a staff member from disability services would accompany him to the library. In the end there was no serious threat, but it was the vigilance of my librarian colleague that led to a good, informed resolution. It's true that had she simply blown it off probably nothing more would have happened. With such attention, the message we are sharing with our staff is that we can't afford to take that chance.

We now require all staff to complete incident reports for any and every act of crime, report of harassment, or anything else they think the administration needs to be aware. That enables us to have good records to document any increases in crime, and have sufficient data for campus security as needed to investigate a case.

We can be safe
The good news is that reports of violent crime in academic libraries are few and far between. When we do hear of a library-based crime, it's usually in a public library. While I have no statistics to support it, my belief is that academic libraries that serve the public experience more crime, both minor and major. That is part of the price paid for the responsibility of meeting the institutional goal of serving the broader community, and we know that many good citizens benefit greatly from what we provide.

Safe haven on campus? The academic library probably never was and never will be. We'll never be able to prevent every crime, the best we can do is to be vigilant and take personal responsibility to act when we believe something is not quite right. We need to create awareness so that all staff know how to respond in a crisis, what actions to take, and how to look out for one another and our community members. That, as they like to say, is the way to take a bite out of crime.


Steven Bell is Associate University Librarian, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. For more from Steven visit his blogs, Kept-Up Academic Librarian, ACRLog and Designing Better Libraries or visit his website.




Reader Comments (4)


I agree that no one can assume safety and security are a given and that it is a shared responsibility. I supervise security guards at a large urban academic library that has adjusted regularly to preserve a safe and secure environment for students,faculty and community users. I believe that security is 90% perception. A library security program with good video surveillance, properly trained guards following well designed procedures and a close working relationship with Campus Police/Security, can achieve a safe and secure environment. No one is guaranteed that they won't be a victim of crime in our library, but we catch and convict over 95% of the individuals who choose to engage in that kind of behavior. The word is out,it's easier to commit a crime somewhere else. Our goal is to move crime beyond our building envelop. Campus Police does the same thing for campus. The result is our surrounding community has a higher crime rate than our campus; our campus has a higher crime rate than our library; we are recognized as the safest place on campus. I feel confident that our library is indeed a haven where individuals safely assemble to focus on scholarship. The "price paid for the responsibility of meeting the institutional goal of serving the broader community" should not be an acceptance of more crime. The price paid should be for well designed library security programs that deliver on the promise of a safe haven for our learning communities.

Posted by Mark Reynolds on February 4, 2011 10:03:28AM

Thanks for sharing your experience with campus crime and library security. You make a good point that with enough security perhaps the library could indeed be a safe haven on campus. I still would want our students to be vigilant. I think that's the challenge neither of us take on. We can put all the pieces in place such as you describe, but when they are careless and create easy opportunities for crime, then crimes will occur - hopefully just ones involving property and not people. Thanks for your comment.

Posted by StevenB on February 6, 2011 06:09:05AM

The column gives all the positive reasons for having a security guard at the entrance and seeking IDs, but doesn't explore the downside at all. Many people, including valid library users, can find the guards off-putting, and make one wonder whether they are entering a battle zone. Worse, universities are expected to be places that value diversity. Seeing a guard at the door does not necessarily imply the same thing to all cultures (either within the U.S. or for international students). In fact, in some cultures the guard can be seen as anything from off-putting to a signal of "you don't belong here." Which brings us to "true security" versus "the illusion of security." Much of the theft in any academic libraries frankly does not occur from "outsiders" who have access to the building, but from "insiders," such as students at that university. In the area of "what is the value and cost for true security," it seems that there may be an analog to security at airports. Some people respond that they will do anything asked to ensure safety in the skies, the road warriors among us will take it in stride and deal with it as just another time to take out our laptops/liquids/gels and take off our shoes/sweaters/coats/belts/jewelery/etc. Yet others others will find full body scanners to be an intrusion on their privacy, and believe that airport security is nothing but an illusion and that all of the effort provides, at best, a limited increase in security given the losses it causes. Libraries are supposed to be places of open inquiry and scholarly interaction. They should be pleasant enjoyable experiences for all who enter. Yes, it is more enjoyable if my stuff and I are secure in the environment in which I enter. However, has anyone recently described going to an airport as being fun? Ultimately each library has to balance the security equation. For some libraries, especially those in urban centers with high walk-in traffic or those private universities that may not have a mission to serve all users, there may be no choice but to place a security guard at the door. However, a guard at the door at all hours may not be right in a bucolic liberal arts college nestled in a small rural town where everyone knows your name. Let us not assume that the ever-present security guard at the door is the right prescription for every situation.

Posted by Arnold Hirshon on February 11, 2011 09:58:02AM

Thanks for adding your perspective to the column Arnold. There's nothing in the column that suggests every academic library needs heavy security, such as a door guard. What is does recommend is doing more to create staff awareness about how to deal with security situations so they'll be better prepared to deal with crime when it happens - or help to prevent it from happening.That's where a security guard can also be helpful - as a bridge between staff and campus security. I would argue that rather than make students feel like they are entering a battle zone, it can make them feel that they are entering a secure environment - and in a rural area where people tend to know each other that is probably not necessary. And while it's true that petty theft and vandalism can be owing to students, my experience at two different institutions is that a serious wave of thefts of laptops, cell phones, book bags, etc. is usually the work of an outsider who is targeting students and watching for when they leave their belongings unattended. Ultimately we catch these folks and they are always outsiders - not students. I agree that our libraries need to be inviting and comfortable and offer an enjoyable experience, but if staff know how to develop relationships with the user community and treat people properly, it's going to make security hardly even noticeable - which is as it should be.

Posted by StevenB on February 22, 2011 09:47:46AM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information


 

Welcome the LJ Archives.

This archive site is the home to all LJ articles published prior to January 2012;
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.