Advertisement
Articles

Scholarly Communication: A Devil's Dictionary | Peer to Peer Review 

Feeling depressed about scholarly publishing, I've channeled Ambrose Bierce

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |
Barbara Fister, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, MN Jul 14, 2011

Barbara Fister, Library Journal Academic Newswire columnist
Photo by Debora Miller

I've been following a rather intriguing series of blog posts on what's wrong with journal publishing by pmr (who, I finally realized, is Peter Murray-Rust - his blog does not have the typical author information one usually finds in those fossilized records of research, the academic article). As a result of thinking about his rousing questions, I felt a bit of Ambrose Bierce coming on. You can find a more optimistic and useful glossary of scholarly communication terms and acronyms provided by Bucknell University. For a snarkier approach to defining our problems, carry on.

Publish: 1) The transformation of knowledge into property. Using funding provided by one's employer and/or a grant, a researcher writes up results and submits them to a corporation (sometimes called a "scholarly society") for consideration; the corporation recruits volunteer researchers to read, comment on, and judge the worthiness of the findings, a rigorous vetting process that, when done well, creates value (also called "prestige") for the publication. If the research passes muster, the author agrees to sign over copyright so that research findings can become the intellectual property of the publisher. 2) Formatting marketing material to mimic freely-donated research findings, sometimes recruiting respected scientists to stand in as authors.

Perish: The stick that prods scholars to write up their research and give it to corporations. Scholars who are unsuccessful in giving their research to corporations, either because corporations don't want it or because scholars choose to share it through other channels, forfeit jobs, promotions, and/or grants.

Intellectual Property: The product of intellectuals rendered into property by the legal action of corporations through assumption of copyright.

Copyright: A limited monopoly on the expression of ideas. The U.S. Constitution has given Congress the full authority to grant short-term monopolies to intellectual property owners. As these owners are increasingly corporations, the incentives to publish no longer bear any relationship to the progress of science and the useful arts (see Perish), and members of congress represent not just citizens, but corporations (see Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission), the definition of "short term" has led some to speculate whether this situation illustrates a new feature of special relativity in which inertia exerts an unusually strong effect on time.

Impact Factor: A formula that calculates the potential impact that being associated with a particular publication will have on a career, including the awarding of tenure, grants, and promotions. Not to be confused with impact on the advancement of knowledge, which has little bearing on careers because it is more difficult for committees to measure.

Basic Research: 1) "What I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing" (attributed to Werner Heisenberg); exploratory research without a known outcome; 2) research into fundamental scientific questions typically funded by taxpayers in order to set the stage for corporations to engage in much more profitable applied research.

Open Access: 1) A new revenue stream created when a small number of idealistic scientists pay publishers to set their freely-donated research findings free in a boutique service; 2) an insignificant fringe movement that distracts scientists and libraries from a problem they actually don't have; 3) a terroristic threat against peer review, high quality science, and life as we know it.

The Republic of Science: (archaic; sometimes called "academic science") A self-regulating system governing the creation of new scientific knowledge through the "spontaneous coordination of independent initiatives" in which members share knowledge in order to advance our common understanding of the world. This decentralized and dynamic system of governance by scientists has been supplanted by a market-based system of competitive reputation-building by scientists coupled with corporate management of new scientific knowledge as a commercial asset.

Author Information

Barbara Fister is a librarian at Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, MN, a contributor to ACRLog, and an author of crime fiction. Her latest mystery, Through the Cracks (see review), was published last year by Minotaur Books.




Reader Comments (6)


Blisteringly on target! Especially the incredibly twisted state of copyright!

Posted by Kate Corbett on July 14, 2011 03:49:33PM

Snort-laugh worthy...thanks Barbara! : )

Posted by Sheryl Kron Rhodes on July 14, 2011 09:46:20PM

I wouldn't be so sure that the US Constitution empowers Congress to grant the privilege known as the 1709 Statute of Anne aka copyright. See http://culturalliberty.org/blog/index.php?id=276

Posted by Crosbie Fitch on July 15, 2011 02:27:41PM

Thanks, all. As for Congress and copyright, I'm thinking of both the language of the constitution (To promote the progress...) and the way that in Eldred v. Ashcroft the Supremes threw up their hands in bafflement and said "It's insane, but Congress gets to decide." That's a pretty funny oral argument to listen to, by the way.

Posted by Barbara on July 15, 2011 09:07:54PM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information


 

Welcome the LJ Archives.

This archive site is the home to all LJ articles published prior to January 2012;
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.